SEO Updates and Submission Data

.

This is default featured slide 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

Sunday, April 24, 2022


Google has two types of web crawling - one is for discovering new content and one is for refreshing content that has already been published.


Google utilizes two types of crawling methods when it goes through webpages — one to discover new content and one to refresh existing content.

This is explained by Google’s Search Advocate John Mueller during the Google Search Central SEO office-hours hangout recorded on January 7.

Googlebot - Crawler


An SEO professional named Swyamdipta Chakraborty joins the livestream to ask Mueller a series of questions, one of which has to do with how often Googlebot crawls his site.

He notes that Googlebot used to crawl his site daily when he published more regularly, but doesn’t crawl as much when fewer articles are published.

Perhaps out of concern that a reduction in crawl frequency is a bad sign, he asks Mueller if this is normal.

Mueller assures him this is fine, and goes on to explain the two types of crawling Googlebot engages in.

Learn more about how Google crawls websites in the section below.

Two Types Of Googlebot Crawling

You can find out how often Googlebot crawls your site via a report in Search Console, and there may be periods when your site is crawled more than others.

When questioned about the report, Mueller confirms the fluctuations are normal and discusses the two types of crawling:

“That can happen. It’s not so much that we crawl a website, but we crawl individual pages of a website. And when it comes to crawling, we have two types of crawling roughly.

One is a discovery crawl where we try to discover new pages on your website. And the other is a refresh crawl where we update existing pages that we know about.”

Not only can crawl frequency vary for the whole site, it can vary by individual webpages.

If your homepage is updated more regularly than other pages, for example, then you’ll see more Googlebot activity on that page.

Mueller continues:

“So for the most part, for example, we would refresh crawl the homepage, I don’t know, once a day, or every couple of hours, or something like that.

And if we find new links on their home page then we’ll go off and crawl those with the discovery crawl as well. And because of that you will always see a mix of discover and refresh happening with regard to crawling. And you’ll see some baseline of crawling happening every day.

But if we recognize that individual pages change very rarely, then we realize we don’t have to crawl them all the time.”

Certain types of websites are likely to be crawled more than others.

A news websites that’s updated multiple times a day will be crawled more than a site that’s updated once a month.

Googlebot is capable of recognizing these patterns and adjusting its crawl frequency accordingly.

“For example, if you have a news website and you update it hourly, then we should learn that we need to crawl it hourly. Whereas if it’s a news website that updates once a month, then we should learn that we don’t need to crawl every hour.

And that’s not a sign of quality, or a sign of ranking, or anything like that. It’s really just purely from a technical point of view we’ve learned we can crawl this once a day, or once a week, and that’s ok.”

So don’t be alarmed if you notice Googlebot is visiting your site more or less often.

Further, don’t be concerned if Googlebot recently crawled your site and updates to existing content aren’t reflected in search results.

That could be a case where Google crawled your site to discover new content, not to refresh existing content.

If your site rarely makes changes to published content, then Googlebot may crawl more for discovery that refreshes.

Again, it doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with content quality. 

Sourcehttps://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-has-two-types-of-crawling-discovery-refresh/432432/#close


Thursday, March 6, 2014

Google Says Switching To HTTPS Won't Change Your Page Rankings

Feb 17, 2014

A Google Webmaster Help thread has someone complaining that his site's rankings dropped and the one thing he noticed was that his home page and 56 other pages are indexed in Google with the https version.

To which John Mueller of Google responded:

Before you get too focused on technical issues, I'd just like to add that going from https to http, or the other way around, generally won't noticeably change your pages' ranking.

So he is implying that there may be something else here to blame for his ranking drop and not the HTTPS issue he is citing.

But is it true that switching from HTTPS to HTTP or the other way around "generally won't noticeably change your pages' ranking?"

Six months ago or so, we covered that making the switch is doable but you need to do it right. Matt Cutts also posted a video on the topic in 2011, of course, things change quickly in search.

Assuming the 301s are set up correctly - I'd say there may be a small down side for a short period of time, in switching from HTTP to HTTPS. Would I make the change here? Nope, not yet at least. I would in a second if Google passed me query data. ;-)

Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help.

Article Courtsey :


SEO Computer Games: Madoogle & Donkey Cutts

This must be a new trend, SEOs making SEO games for the SEO community. Good link bait? Yes. Fun, somewhat.
We have two games:
(1) Donkey Cutts - a play on Donkey Kong, but the characters switched to be personalities in the SEO space. Including Matt Cutts, Pandas, Penguins, links, social, and much more.
(2) Madoogle - a play on Angry Birds, but the birds change to the faces of SEO personalizes and you hit black hats.
Here are pictures of both games:
Donkey Cutts
Madoogle
It is hard to know exactly who the personalities are in Donkey Cutts, outside of Matt, but here they are:
Donkey Cutts SEOs
Steve Webb thinks they are Danny Sullivan, Rand Fishkin, Wil Reynolds, and Barry Schwartz (me). I am not 100% sure.
In the other game it is easier:
madoogle SEOs
You have Matt Cutts, Rand Fishkin, Lisa Barone and myself.
Forum discussion at Google+.
Article Courtsey
ttp://www.seroundtable.com/seo-computer-games-18121.html


Friday, January 24, 2014

The Top Five SEO Mistakes According To Google’s Matt Cutts

In a recently published video, Matt Cutts, Google’s head of search spam, listed off the Top Five SEO Mistakes webmasters make.
Matt said these are not the most devastating mistakes, but rather, the most common mistakes.
  1. Not having a website or having a website that is not crawlable is the biggest mistake he sees.
  2. Not including the right words on the page. The example Matt gave is: don’t just write, “Mt. Everest Height” but write, “How high is Mt. Everest?” because that is how people search.
  3. Don’t think about link building, think about compelling content and marketing.
  4. Don’t forget to think about the title and description of your most important pages.
  5. Not using webmaster resources and learning about how Google works and what SEO is about. 

Thursday, January 23, 2014

Hold Your SEO Client Hostage With Negative SEO Threats


A WebmasterWorld thread has a story of a webmaster who received a phone call from someone with an Indian accent threatening to use negative SEO on their site if they don't pay up. A form of search pirates, if you will.


This is what the webmaster's client said:
"So I had a client phone me today and say he had a call from a guy with an Indian accent who told him that he will destroy his website rankings if he doesn't pay him £10 per month to NOT do this. What the hell... "

This is not new, we've covered stories like this before. Threats to use the disavow tool against you, well you can't. Threats of negative SEO and much more.

What can you do? Well, you can monitor your new links in Google Webmaster Tools and anything that looks bad, add them to your disavow link file. It shouldn't cost or take too much time to do that.

Of course, Google has said time and time again that while negative SEO is hard it is possible.

Which is why they came out with the disavow link tool.  So track your new links in Google Webmaster Tools and disavow the bad new links.



Jan 17, 2014 • 8:05 am | by Barry Schwartz | Filed Under Google Search Engine Optimization

 


Know about Zemanta Links and Google's Guidelines




Zemanta is a content discovery platform, they have a popular WordPress plugin that helps bloggers find related posts and related images while you write your post.


It does mention a bit on links on the plugin page:
  • Link Love by linking to other bloggers' related posts. In turn, we'll recommend your posts to other bloggers. Then find out how much love (links, tweets, likes) your posts received via Zemanta Dashboard.
So the links are not automatically added, they are suggested to the bloggers and the bloggers can add it. Is that an issue? Probably not.

What might be an issue, as WebmasterWorld martinibuster said in a WebmasterWorld thread, the links to Zemanta's web site.

Chris Boggs noted in a Facebook post, which is private, but martinibuster cited it in a public thread, that a Forbes article has links to Zemanta's web site for the keyword anchor text of "SEO" and "PageRank." How is Zemanta related to those keywords he asks.


I thought it was all good until Chris Boggs, in a Facebook post, noted the dofollow links to Zemanta embedded within a Forbes article, using the anchor text, "SEO" in one place and the phrase "PageRank" in another spot within the article. Really? Zemanta feels it is relevant for the phrase, "PageRank?"

Is this going to get Zemanta in hot water with Google? 

Friday, January 17, 2014

High PR Social Bookmarking Sites 2013 List